33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives of your police is to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, make certain regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to the offender as well as the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other Courts, but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.

How much sway case regulation holds may differ by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances from the current case. To discover this concept, think about the following case legislation definition.

10 . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair for the offender and also the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more

thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is proven as well as the employee is found guilty after due process of regulation, it is the prerogative from the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, outside of the different penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not proportionate with the seriousness from the act of misconduct is not enough even so the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion within a structured and lawful manner. Read more

For your foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order regarding cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more

27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted within a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically produce exoneration from departmental charges based to the same factual grounds. Even though a writ under Article 199 is obtainable in specific limited situations, it is generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-look at witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't persuade the department of his/her innocence.

Quite a few judgments have affirmed that the mere website registration of the crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in positioning the Petitioner's name within the ECL based over the criminal case are inconsistent with founded legal principles. Consequently, this petition must be allowed Read more

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's very well-settled that although taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should look at the merit of many of the eligible candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these eligible candidates who're found to generally be most meritorious among them. For the reason that petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked from the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part from the respondent department.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle founded by a court, which other courts are obligated to observe.

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to your offender plus the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere into a tradition that the reader should have the ability to deduce the logic from the decision plus the statutes.[4]

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

States also normally have courts that manage only a specific subset of legal matters, including family legislation and probate. Case regulation, also known as precedent or common regulation, could be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending to the relationship between the deciding court along with the precedent, case law might be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for your Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting in California (whether a federal or state court) just isn't strictly bound to Stick to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by one district court in Big apple will not be binding on another district court, but the original court’s reasoning may well help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions with the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more